ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026
Optimal Reactive Balance Training Characteristics Poststroke: Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.
Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeReactive balance training (RBT) has shown promise for enhancing reactive balance control and reducing falls poststroke. However, the optimal training parameters (e.g., intensity, duration) are unknown. This secondary analysis examined dose-response relationships between specific reactive balance training characteristics and improvements in reactive balance control and fall rates poststroke.
methods30 people with chronic stroke (mean age: 66.6 ± 8.8 years; time after stroke: 3.3 ± 2.3 years) completed up to 12 one-hour reactive balance training sessions, twice per week. Training included experiencing losses of balance due to internal or external perturbations while performing voluntary tasks. The tasks were of four types: stable, quasi-mobile, mobile, and unpredictable, each with choice of three difficulty levels (normal, increased, or reduced). Multiple linear regression (reactive balance outcome) and negative binomial regression (fall rates) were used to model associations between training characteristics (total number of perturbations, task difficulty, perceived challenge, and success rate) and post-training fall rates and changes in the reactive balance control sub-score of the mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest).
resultsA higher number of perturbations were significantly associated with better post-intervention reactive balance scores on the mini-BEST (p = 0.010). There were no significant associations with any other training characteristics and post-intervention mini-BEST Scores. For fall incidence rates, there were no significant associations with any training characteristic (all p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: Greater exposure to RBT was associated with improvements in reactive balance control among individuals with chronic stroke. Participants who completed a higher number of perturbations within the standardized 12-session protocol showed greater improvements in reactive balance control, consistent with a dose-response association. These results indicate that training volume-reflected in the number of perturbations experienced-may be an important factor to consider when refining RBT protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.