Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42130056›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2026

Infants and Mobiles: Developing an Understanding of Cause and Effect.

Xia Xu, Jochen Triesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xia XuFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-7217
Jochen TrieschFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8166-2441

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC3066/1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR5368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mobile conjugate reinforcement paradigm, an infant's leg is connected to a mobile via a string, allowing the infant to move the mobile via moving their leg. Over a few minutes, infants exhibit an increase in the frequency of movement of the connected leg. This behavior is sometimes interpreted as an indication that infants experience the efficacy of causal control. However, some researchers have argued that an underlying causal model is not necessary and that a simple reinforcement model that favors mobile movements can explain this behavioral pattern. Interestingly, after the mobile is disconnected from the leg, some infants transiently show an even higher frequency of movement, a phenomenon known as the extinction burst, that is hard to reconcile with a simple reinforcement learning model alone. In this study, we propose different computational models and study to what extent they are capable of capturing infants' behavior. In particular, we construct an active-learning causal model that is capable of discovering the underlying cause-effect relationship on the fly without the need to specify either the cause or the effect in advance. We also propose an active-learning mechanism based on expectation violation, that can be combined with the proposed causal model and a number of alternative models, including a naïve reinforcement model, to give rise to an extinction burst. Overall, our work sheds light on possible learning mechanisms giving rise to infant's developing understanding of cause and effect relationships. SUMMARY: A causality-driven model is proposed that successfully simulates infant behavior in the mobile paradigm. The causal model actively discovers the underlying causal mechanism, while alternative models fail under specific simulated conditions. An active-learning mechanism based on expectation violation is introduced that unifies causal learning and hypothesis-testing within a single, coherent framework. We show that this mechanism successfully models the extinction burst and demonstrates robustness across different experimental settings.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentComprehensionInfant BehaviorReinforcement, PsychologyExtinction, PsychologicalHumansInfantLearningMovementReinforcement Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42130056
PMCPMC13172668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.