ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026
Virtual Reality Simulation in Disaster Nursing Education and Training: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Virtual Reality Simulation in Disaster Nursing Education and Training: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisaster response presents significant challenges to the competence of nurses. Virtual reality simulation (VRS) offers innovative opportunities for nursing administrators and educators in the field of disaster nursing education and training.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the use and effectiveness of virtual reality simulations in disaster nursing education and training.
methodsA scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, extended by Levac. The following databases were systematically searched from inception to August 30, 2024: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database and CBM. Two researchers independently screened the identified articles and extracted relevant data. This scoping review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.
resultsThe review included thirteen studies published between 2013 and 2024. Of these, seven studies employed a quasi-experimental design, six utilised a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design and one study used a longitudinal experimental design. The disaster nursing education and training content covered six main areas: triage training, on-site first aid training, infectious disease prevention and control, disaster response skills training, emergency response training for nursing staff and post-disaster psychological recovery training. The reported outcomes primarily focused on Kirkpatrick's Level 1 (participant satisfaction with the training experience) and Level 2 (measuring the benefit to participants from the training). RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This scoping review identified the research progress and trends of virtual reality simulation technology in the process of cultivating disaster nursing talents at home and abroad and provides a reference for disaster nursing managers and educators to conduct disaster nursing training based on virtual reality simulation technology. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This is a review article based on a review of the literature, with no patient participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.