ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2026
Combined cyclosporine A and urolithin A therapy ameliorates murine lupus nephritis.
Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monotherapies for lupus nephritis (LN) often fail to fully control the disease's hallmark, renal inflammation and immune complex deposition. This study investigates a novel combination therapeutic strategy using urolithin A (UA), a multifaceted anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent, with cyclosporine A (CsA), an established immunosuppressant. The combination therapy's superior efficacy is evidenced by a robust reduction in immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-dsDNA levels, with markedly improved renal function. The treatment also effectively mitigated immune complex deposition and multiple inflammatory chemokines, including I309, IL-16, and MIP-3. This alleviated kidney damage and suppressed lymphocyte infiltration. We found that CsA alone was ineffective across the analyzed markers, while UA alone produced only a modest effect, highlighting the complementary action of their combination. These findings underscore the potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of UA and suggest that combining it with CsA offers a more robust strategy for controlling inflammation and preserving renal integrity in LN. Given the FDA-approved status of CsA and UA's "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) classification, this combination therapy presents a promising and practical clinical pathway for the treatment of lupus nephritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.