ArticleBMJ open2026
Exploring transitions in care for individuals living with and beyond cancer: A qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCancer care involves multiple healthcare providers across various settings. Each time the responsibility of care is transferred from one healthcare provider or setting, referred to as transitions in care (TiC), there is an increased risk of medical error, patient dissatisfaction with care and poor outcomes. The objective of this study is to explore patient perspectives and experiences with TiC during cancer care, and to identify perceived gaps in care during TiC among individuals living with and beyond cancer.
designA qualitative study using the interpretive descriptive approach was used to generate clinically relevant insights. Participants were recruited between 1 September 2022 and 9 September 2023, using purposive sampling to obtain a diverse sample. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed with thematic analysis.
settingThis study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Cancer care in Alberta is provided through a publicly funded, single-payer healthcare system.
results31 interviews were conducted, with three themes emerging: (1) Communication as a key driver of continuity and quality during TiC, (2) Complexity and fragmentation create variation and confusion in care and (3) From system to person: how system failure and strengths shape individual experiences of TiC.
conclusionThe study highlights the multifaceted nature of TiC among individuals living with and beyond cancer and emphasizes the need for patient-centred, coordinated approaches to improve the quality of care for individuals living with and beyond cancer. The findings highlight the emotional strain during TiC, which can be eased when patients feel informed, supported and involved in decision-making. Survivors can apply this by preparing questions in advance and engaging with support networks. Whereas providers can offer check-ins and clear next steps during TiC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.