ArticleBMJ open2026
Capturing risk awareness and disease burden in cardiovascular (risk) management: development and content validation of a new module for the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and is associated with a broad range of physical, emotional and social burdens. Existing tools such as Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation and WHO CVD risk charts identify clinical risk factors but fail to capture patient-perceived burden and the risk of burden awareness. The Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC)-tool, a validated, person-centred instrument, offers a more holistic approach. The aim of the current study is to develop and validate a new module within the ABCC-tool for patients with an elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk or CVD (cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) module). DESIGN AND
settingA mixed-methods design was used across four phases and expert meetings to identify the items for the module. All phases took place in the Netherlands. Phase 1 (literature search) was performed in 2021, phase 2 (semistructured interviews) was completed between January and October 2021, phase 3 (survey) was completed in November 2023 and December 2024, and phase 4 (semistructured interviews) was completed in January 2025.
participantsPhase 2 involved 14 experts by experience (patients with CVD or people at elevated risk) and 10 healthcare professionals in the field of CVD. Phase 3 included 86 healthcare professionals. Phase 4 included 12 experts by experience. In total, four expert meetings took place, attended by three experts by experience, nine healthcare professionals and seven researchers. OUTCOME MEASURES: The module was refined iteratively, using qualitative and quantitative insights at each phase of development. The model was only finalised after thorough content validation.
resultsNo suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) focusing specifically on CVRM were identified in the literature. Interviews revealed significant burdens in terms of physical, emotional and social burdens. Feedback from expert meetings and validation rounds led to substantive refinement. The final module contains 10 items and was deemed valid by both experts by experience and healthcare professionals.
conclusionThe CVRM module of the ABCC-tool has been systematically developed and validated in terms of content. The final module focuses on the multidimensional burden of CVD and dealing with its risk factors and aims to support self-management. The module complements existing risk assessment tools by focusing on the burden experienced by the patient and the burden resulting from risk awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.