ArticleBMJ open2026
Development and validation of a community-reported outcome measure of the value of school-based screening programmes for Indigenous populations: a mixed-methods study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFor priority populations, such as Indigenous children, school-based screening programmes can increase equitable access to care. However, current traditional economic measures evaluating the effectiveness of many screening programmes in Australia do not capture the value perceived by those at the intersection of the benefits, including children and families, communities, health workers and teachers or the differences between Western-Anglo and Indigenous conceptualisations of health. This mixed-methods study aims to develop and validate a Community Reported Outcome Measure (CROM) of school health screening programmes based on concepts of value of health and healthcare and school screening programmes from the perspective of Indigenous peoples. The purpose of the tool is to provide a robustly developed and validated tool to assess the experiences of school health screening programmes from the perspective of Indigenous stakeholders including families, communities, health workers and teachers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This mixed-methods study will be conducted in three stages in accordance with regulatory and international consensus guidance: (1) concept elicitation to construct a conceptual framework of value in school screening; (2) item generation and mapping to the conceptual framework and (3) a psychometric evaluation of the CROM. Phase 1 concept elicitation: this involves an umbrella review (phase 1.1); yarning circles with communities in New South Wales (phase 1.2); concept integration of the umbrella review and yarning circles data (phase 1.3) and an online e-Delphi study to ensure the framework of value is nationally representative (phase 1.4). Phase 2 item generation and mapping: this involves item generation (phase 2.1) and cognitive testing of the item pool (phase 2.2). Phase 3 psychometric evaluation: this involves field testing (phase 3.1) and assessing the structural validity of the CROM via Rasch analysis (phase 3.2). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was reviewed and approved by the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (Ref: REC-0397) and State Education Research and Partnerships (Ref: SERAP 6500). The results of this study will be presented at relevant academic and non-scientific conferences and meetings and published in high-impact peer-reviewed journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.