Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129976›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2026

Introduction to secret sharing based secure multiparty computation in health data.

Steven Kerr, Daniel Escudero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven KerrThe University of Edinburgh Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK steven.kerr@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3643-7859
Daniel EscuderoIndependent Researcher, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJoint analyses across multiple health datasets can increase statistical power and improve the generalisability of research findings. However, limitations on data sharing often prevent researchers from fully realising these benefits. Existing approaches such as federated analytics involve sharing information, which poses challenges due to data governance and security restrictions.Secure multiparty computation (SMPC) is a set of cryptographic techniques that allows joint analyses across multiple private datasets with zero information sharing except for the agreed outputs. Despite its transformative potential in health research, SMPC has received relatively little attention within the health data landscape.

objectivesThis article gives an introduction to secret sharing based SMPC that is accessible with no prior knowledge assumed. We explain how secret sharing techniques work, and the security guarantees they offer. We also discuss SMPC software, and offer our view on the most promising approaches to implementation.

conclusionSMPC has significant potential for enabling privacy-preserving analyses, and could become a standard tool in the future for collaborative health data research. As efforts to improve data access and integration continue, it will be increasingly important for health data researchers to have an understanding of SMPC so they can use it effectively.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityInformation DisseminationConfidentialityHumansSoftwareDigital TechnologyHealth informaticsMethodsSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID42129976
PMCPMC13182292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.