ArticleBMJ open2026
Experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making in South Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional survey of the general public.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesActive patient involvement is a core principle of patient-centred care, yet public experiences of medical decision-making in non-Western settings remain underexamined. In South Korea, nationwide evidence on how adults experience, perceive and prefer medical decision-making is limited. This study, therefore, examined Korean adults' experiences, perceptions and preferences regarding medical decision-making.
designA cross-sectional study was conducted between March and April 2025 using online data collection for adults aged 19-59 years and face-to-face interviews for those aged 60 years or older.
settingThis nationwide survey was conducted in South Korea.
participantsA total of 1081 Korean adults were recruited using proportional quotas for sex, age group and region. After excluding withdrawals and invalid responses, 1000 were included (response rate 92.5%).
resultsOverall, 70.4% of respondents reported at least one significant health-related decision in the past 2 years. Although 34.1% reported making their most recent decision independently, a larger proportion preferred collaborative decision-making involving clinicians and/or family members. The clinician's explanation was the most influential factor (77.4%). Preferences for primary decision-maker varied by clinical context: patient-led decisions were favoured for low-risk interventions such as vaccination (78.5%), whereas physician involvement was preferred for life-threatening illness (86.2%). Communication ratings were highest for presentation of treatment options (mean score 3.56±0.79 on a 5-point scale) and lowest for explanation of potential treatment risks (mean score 3.20±0.89). Participants satisfied with decision outcomes reported higher communication quality (p<0.001), while those reporting neutral satisfaction (37.1%) resembled dissatisfied participants (4.1%).
conclusionsMedical decision-making was common, but respondents' experiences did not always match their preference for collaborative involvement. The findings suggest that strengthening patient-centred care in South Korea will require not only improvements in patient-clinician communication, but also attention to family involvement and structural conditions such as limited consultation time and current reimbursement arrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.