ArticleBMC nutrition2026
Understanding preferences regarding protein-enriched plant-based products of patients with lived experience of (risk of) malnutrition - a grounded theory study.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimDisease-related malnutrition is common in the Netherlands, and its treatment often involves the use of animal-based protein-enriched products. There is a growing trend and increasing ambition towards a more plant-based diet in the Dutch population and within Dutch healthcare institutions. However, patients may struggle to meet their protein requirements, as the availability of plant-based protein-enriched products remains limited. Patient preferences for such products have not yet been explored. This study aimed to understand patient preferences regarding plant-based protein-enriched products of patients with lived experience of (risk of) malnutrition.
methodsIn this grounded theory study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (≥ 18 years) with recent or current lived experience of (risk of) malnutrition. We systematically analysed the data using open, axial, and selective coding, resulting in themes, using ATLAS.ti and following COREQ guidelines.
resultsData of 17 out of 18 patients were included in the analysis. Five themes emerged, that addressed product variety, dislikes, health and societal/social considerations, convenience, and packaging. The wish to balance convenience and sustainability gave rise to contradictory product demands. Values of health, sustainability, and animal welfare were similar across participants who were used to eat primarily animal-based and plant-based.
conclusionPatients prefer varied, easy-to-eat plant-based products, avoiding strong smells, unhealthy ingredients, and large portions. Emphasizing shared values of health, sustainability, and animal welfare can promote adoption of plant-based options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.