SynthesisAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026
Time-related changes in bacterial air contamination of sterile covered items in operating rooms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is still only limited evidence regarding how bacterial air contamination of sterile items changes over time in the operating room, even when protected by sterile covers. This review aimed to synthesize the available data to inform safe handling and preparation of sterile equipment.
methodsA systematic search was conducted for controlled studies that assessed time-related bacterial contamination of covered sterile items in operating rooms and that reported the outcome as colony forming units (CFU) measured at two or more time points, generating distinct timelines. Six databases were searched from inception to 1 September 2025: Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science. A meta-analysis was performed using linear regression with CFU as the dependent variable and time (minutes) as the independent variable. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251018280).
resultsFive timelines from four studies evaluating CFU counts yielded an R
conclusionsTime has only a modest impact on bacterial contamination of sterile items when protective covers are used, with minimal increases in CFU over different waiting periods. Clinically, this confirms that properly covered sterile items can be prepared in advance without compromising microbial safety, thus supporting efficient operating room organization and workflow. These findings reinforce the effectiveness of sterile covers as a key measure to reduce the risk of surgical site infections and ensure the safe handling of sterile equipment. Although covered storage appears safe, minimizing unnecessary waiting time, even with coverage, is good clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.