Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129916›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Organ donation after ECPR: ethical challenges and clinical implications.

Sasa Rajsic, Eduard Argudo, Sylvia Maria Belda Hofheinz, María Martínez Martínez, Ana Delgado, Soňa Wulczyňská, Robert Breitkopf, Gabriel Putzer, Jonah Rubin, Malaika Mendonca and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sasa RajsicDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Sasa.rajsic@i-med.ac.at.
Eduard ArgudoIntensive Care Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Sylvia Maria Belda HofheinzMother-Child Health and Development Network (Red SAMID), PICU University HospitalComplutense University MadridISCIII Investigation Institute Hospital, 12 de Octubre12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
María Martínez MartínezIntensive Care Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana DelgadoIntensive Care Department, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Soňa WulczyňskáClinic of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Department, General University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Robert BreitkopfDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gabriel PutzerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jonah RubinDivision of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Malaika MendoncaPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's University Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Marta Velia AntoniniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Justyna SwolDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Mirko BelliatoSC AR2-Anestesia E Terapia Intensiva Cardiotoracica, Foundation IRCCS Policlinic San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Jan Bělohlávek2nd Department of Medicine-Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
EuroELSO ECPR Working Group on Ethics and Organ Donation

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) offers a life-saving option for select patients with refractory cardiac arrest, yet a substantial proportion suffer devastating neurological injury and die despite extracorporeal support. In this context, organ donation may emerge as a potential downstream pathway, introducing complex ethical tensions at the intersection of life-sustaining treatment, end-of-life care, and organ preservation. This narrative review examines the ethical challenges associated with organ donation following ECPR, with particular attention to the transition from resuscitative intent to donation-oriented care. We discuss the clinical and ethical challenges of ECPR programs related to patient autonomy, informed consent, conflicts of interest, and equity of access in both adult and paediatric populations. Building on core principles of biomedical ethics, we propose a structured ethical model to guide clinicians and institutions navigating these scenarios. Central elements include strict separation between resuscitative and donation-related decision-making, transparent prognostication, robust safeguards around treatment intent, and early integration of ethics consultation and structured communication processes. We extend the prior evidence by offering ECPR-specific considerations, including concrete governance triggers, bedside tools, the integration of paediatric perspectives, and the translation of ethical principles into operational guidance. By defining clear ethical boundaries and governance mechanisms, this review aims to support the responsible integration of organ donation pathways following ECPR, while preserving public trust and reaffirming the primacy of patient-centred care.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationTissue and Organ ProcurementDecision MakingHumansInformed ConsentDCDDecision-makingDNCECMOECPREnd-of-life careEthicsOrgan donation

Identifiers

PMID42129916
PMCPMC13339409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.