ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Provider attitudes and organizational support for cervical cancer screening implementation across PEPFAR-supported HIV clinics in Kenya.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), disproportionally affecting women living with HIV. Integration of CC screening and treatment of precancerous lesions into established HIV care systems supported by the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has resulted in screening of millions of women and treatment of tens of thousands of precancerous lesions. Despite these gains, research has largely focused on patient-level barriers to screening, with limited attention to provider attitudes, organizational climate, and leadership support within PEPFAR-supported HIV clinics.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted with 46 clinic staff at seven affiliated faith-based HIV clinics overseen by the Coptic Hope Center for Infectious Diseases in Nairobi County, Kenya. The Coptic Hope Center is funded by PEPFAR through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Clinic staff completed three validated implementation science instruments: the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-36), the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS), and the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS). Total and subscale scores were computed, and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to examine associations between staff and clinic characteristics and total scores.
resultsClinic staff reported moderate overall EBPAS-36 scores, median (M) = 3.06 on a 0-4 scale, reflecting positive attitudes towards CC screening implementation. The highest ratings were observed for Feedback, Fit, Openness, and Appeal subscales, indicating both the appeal of current screening methods and openness to novel approaches. ICS (M = 2.36) and ILS (M = 3.62 for staff; 2.71 for supervisors) scores indicated moderate to strong organizational and leadership support, though lower scores on Rewards and Selection for EBP subscales suggest limited institutional incentives. No significant differences were observed by clinic type, staff role and years in position.
conclusionsStaff attitudes, leadership engagement, and organizational climate were broadly supportive of CC screening implementation across PEPFAR-supported clinics in Nairobi, Kenya. As countries in SSA seek to sustain the gains achieved through integrated HIV and CC prevention programs and adapt to evolving donor funding landscapes, preserving positive provider environments is essential to effective service delivery and keeping countries on the path toward CC elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.