ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Indications, therapeutic modalities and clinical outcomes of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in Italy, the ITA-OTI Study: a multicentre prospective observational study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-world data describing contemporary hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) practice in Italy are limited. This study aimed to describe current clinical indications and therapeutic modalities of HBOT at the national level.
methodsWe conducted a multicentre, prospective, observational national study, promoted by Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). We included consecutive patients who underwent HBOT in 10 study centres within a period of 12 weeks, for any treatment indication. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of treatments by clinical indication and urgency of treatment.
resultsOverall, 327 patients were included across 10 centres, of which 73.7% (n = 241) received elective and 26.3% (n = 86) urgent treatments. The most frequent indication was sudden hearing loss (35.8%), followed by carbon monoxide poisoning (19.9%) and soft tissue infection (12.2%). Treatments were delivered at a median of 2.5 ATA, with two oxygen cycles for session and a median of 16 sessions for patients. No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionsIn Italy, HBOT is applied in accordance with national and international guidelines. The most frequent indications to treatment were sudden hearing loss, carbon monoxide poisoning, and soft tissue infections. Treatments had similar characteristics across the centres, with heterogeneity mainly regarding the number of sessions per patient. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.