ArticleBMC research notes2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward artificial intelligence in medicine among iranian physicians and medical students: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding metabolic complication management after solid organ transplantation among medical staff in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare worldwide, yet the readiness of physicians and medical students to adopt AI-particularly in low- and middle-income settings-remains insufficiently understood. Examining knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward AI is essential for informing educational priorities and implementation strategies.
objectivesThis study aimed assessing AI-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Iranian physicians and medical students, examine demographic differences, and identify barriers to AI adoption.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using an online convenience sampling approach across medical universities and clinical settings in Iran between June and August 2024. A validated questionnaire was developed based on a comprehensive literature review of existing KAP surveys related to artificial intelligence and digital health which assessed AI-related knowledge (3 items), attitudes (27 items), and practices (5 items). The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha and ICC. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine associations between demographic variables and KAP outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05.
resultsA total of 238 participants completed the survey, including 165 physicians (69.7%) and 72 medical students (30.3%). Overall, 61.3% demonstrated good knowledge, 83.2% had positive attitudes, and 58.4% showed good AI-related practice. Medical students had higher mean knowledge scores than physicians (0.62 (SD = 0.32) vs. 0.58 (SD = 0.35); p = 0.025). Younger participants (18-25 years) showed higher mean knowledge than those aged > 65 years (0.70 (SD = 0.29) vs. 0.36 (SD = 0.36); p = 0.036). Although attitudes toward AI were uniformly positive (97.4% considered AI essential in medicine), practice levels were lower, particularly among participants aged 50-65 years (Mean practice score (SD) = 0.52 (0.21); p < 0.01). In adjusted analyses, age 50-65 years was independently associated with lower odds of good practice (AOR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.04-0.41).
conclusionsDespite strong support for AI integration among Iranian physicians and medical students, gaps remain between positive attitudes and real-world AI use, especially among older clinicians. Structured, practice-oriented AI training and improved institutional infrastructure are needed to facilitate effective and equitable adoption of AI in Iran's healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.