ArticleReproductive health2026
High folic acid supplementation is associated with vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy in a fetal sex-specific manner: findings from two prospective cohort studies.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVaginal bleeding in early pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Excess folic acid ingestion has shown potential adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. However, little is known about the fetal sex-specific influence of excess folic acid supplementation on vaginal bleeding. We aimed to determine whether increasing folic acid supplementation is associated with vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy with respect to fetal sex.
methodsTwo prospective cohorts of nulliparous pregnant women were accessed: prior to (SCOPE, n = 1164) and post (STOP, n = 1300) folic acid food fortification in Australia. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between folic acid supplementation and vaginal bleeding severity with fetal sex, as well as the relationship between vaginal bleeding and pregnancy outcomes, after adjusting for confounders.
resultsReported spotting and mild vaginal bleeding was more common in STOP, compared with SCOPE. Women from the two cohorts who experienced spotting and mild vaginal bleeding in pregnancy were more likely to have supplemented with ≥ 800 μg folic acid daily and had higher serum folate concentration, compared with no folic acid supplementation. Women who supplemented with ≥ 800 μg folic acid per day, and with a male bearing pregnancy, had > twofold greater odds [adjOR 2.14, (95% CI) 1.15-3.99, SCOPE and STOP] of vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy which was more likely to be more severe compared to those who did not supplement. This association was stronger (adjOR 2.85, 95%CI 1.23-6.57) in the STOP cohort. Furthermore, vaginal bleeding was associated with spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) without premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption and small for gestational age (SGA) and lower gestational age at birth, the latter of which showed a male-fetus dependence, based on total cases in the two cohorts combined.
conclusionsThis study reveals a novel association between fetal sex and vaginal bleeding during early pregnancy, which is influenced by high folic acid intake. Our data suggest < 800 μg/day folic acid supplementation post food fortification may be safer, especially in male-bearing pregnancy, consistent with guidelines that recommend 400 μg/day folic acid to prevent neural tube defects. Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy needs more clinical attention as it may be an indicator for later pregnancy adverse outcomes.
trial registrationSCOPE and STOP studies were registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12607000551493; Registration date 26th October 2007 and ACTRN12614000985684; Registration date 12th September 2014, respectively).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.