ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026
'It might help, but it won't fix me': a qualitative study of individuals' beliefs about manual therapy for low back pain.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManual therapy is recommended for the management of low back pain (LBP). However, there are gaps in our knowledge about how individuals understand and view the role of manual therapy in the management of their LBP. Beliefs about manual therapy may influence behaviors and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to develop an in-depth understanding of the beliefs about manual therapy held by a group of individuals experiencing LBP.
methodsTwenty-one participants with a history of LBP and varied experience of manual therapy participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the dataset was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. A patient and public involvement group contributed to the design of the study.
resultsFive themes were generated: (1) Manual therapy as movement. Manual therapy is predominantly believed to be a transient mechanical treatment aimed at addressing restriction in the back. (2) Self-management and manual therapy go 'hand in hand'. Self-management was seen as a fundamental and complementary element of manual therapy. (3) Helping me manage or trying to 'fix' my back. The participants who believed that manual therapy was an appropriate long-term treatment felt that it could help manage their LBP rather than provide a permanent 'fix'. (4) All or nothing: the value of the therapeutic alliance. Beliefs about the importance of the therapeutic alliance with a manual therapist varied considerably, with some participants being dismissive of its value. (5) In safe hands? Most participants had no concerns about the safety of manual therapy, conditional on their trust in the manual therapist. However, some participants expressed significant concerns about safety.
conclusionParticipants' beliefs about their LBP and the role of manual therapy were shaped by a predominantly mechanical model. However, participants with greater experience of manual therapy often perceived the therapeutic alliance as beneficial for managing their LBP and addressing psychosocial factors. Manual therapists should be aware of unhelpful beliefs held by LBP patients that can potentially influence behaviors and outcomes. In addition, patients' beliefs about the risks and benefits of treatment should be explored to facilitate shared decision making around the use of manual therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.