Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129739›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Profile and association between pain sensitivity and physical fitness in individuals with chronic low back pain.

Mary Jacqueline L C Yeung, Fiona H Y Fok, Jenny W L Kwan, Christy W S Lui, Sharon M H Tsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary Jacqueline L C YeungDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Fiona H Y FokDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jenny W L KwanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Christy W S LuiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sharon M H TsangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Sharon.Tsang@polyu.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the profile and associations between pain sensitivity, psychological factors, and physical fitness in adults with chronic low back pain (LBP), and explored whether these associations differed from healthy controls.MethodsThirty‑six adults (18 chronic LBP; 18 healthy controls) completed questionnaires assessing psychological profiles (Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and pain sensitization (Central Sensitization Inventory). Quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain threshold, vibration detection threshold, mechanical temporal summation) was performed at local (low back) and distal sites. Physical fitness was assessed using the 6‑Minute Walk Test, Back Extension Endurance Test, and Modified Bruce Treadmill Test. Between‑group comparisons analysed using t‑tests or Wilcoxon tests, while associations between pain sensitivity, psychological factors, and physical fitness were examined using multiple linear regression.ResultsCompared with healthy controls, individuals with chronic LBP mild pain and functional disability demonstrated significantly higher anxiety and depression (t = - 2.376, p = 0.023), disability (t = - 4.276, p < 0.001), catastrophizing (Z = - 2.146, p = 0.032), and Central Sensitization Inventory scores (t = 0.982, p = 0.035), alongside lower vibration detection thresholds at the low back (Z = - 3.338, p < 0.001) and shorter 6‑Minute Walk distance (t = 2.124, p = 0.041). Regression modelling showed that sensory, psychological, and anthropometric variables explained 60% of the variance in walking distance (adjusted R² = 0.60, p = 0.002). Greater distal PPT and height predicted longer distance, whereas greater temporal summation (local and distal), higher weight, and higher psychological distress predicted shorter distance. No sensory or psychological variables independently predicted back extensor endurance or estimated aerobic capacity. Exploratory subgroup analyses revealed that walking performance in healthy controls was primarily anthropometric‑driven, whereas in chronic LBP, nociplastic sensory features and psychological distress showed stronger associations.ConclusionsIndividuals with chronic LBP demonstrated altered somatosensory and psychological profiles and reduced walking capacity. Walking performance was most strongly associated with pain sensitivity and psychological distress, particularly among those with chronic mild LBP. Future studies involving individuals with higher pain intensity and chronicity are warranted to clarify mechanistic pathways and potential mediation effects.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainPain ThresholdPhysical FitnessAdultAnxietyCase-Control StudiesCatastrophizationCentral Nervous System SensitizationDepressionDisability EvaluationExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedChronic low back painPhysical fitnessPsychological profilesQuantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID42129739
PMCPMC13343800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.