SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026
The effect of physical activity on health outcomes in individuals with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis meta-analysis systematically evaluates the effect of physical activity on specific health outcomes in individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), including body composition parameters and quality of life, to inform clinical exercise rehabilitation.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL was performed from database inception to March 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that compared physical activity interventions plus usual care against usual care alone in individuals with anorexia nervosa. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects models were used for all meta-analyses.
resultsEleven RCTs met inclusion criteria, with all 11 contributing data to meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed no statistically significant differences in body weight (MD = 0.62, 95% CI [-0.74, 1.98], P = 0.37), BMI (MD = 0.59, 95% CI [-0.42, 1.60], P = 0.25), body fat percentage (MD = 0.62, 95% CI [-0.22, 1.46], P = 0.15), or quality of life (SMD = 0.07, 95% CI [-0.53, 0.68], P = 0.82), whereas muscle strength improved significantly (SMD = 0.99, 95% CI [0.45, 1.53], P < 0.001). Physical activity interventions were well tolerated, with no adverse effects on weight restoration. Sensitivity analyses excluding high-risk studies confirmed robustness, and no meaningful publication bias was detected.
conclusionSupervised physical activity, particularly resistance training, shows promise as a safe adjunct to standard care in anorexia nervosa. Pooled results indicate significant gains in muscle strength, whereas no statistically significant between-group differences were detected for body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, or quality of life. Due to the limitations of the available data, future studies should include larger multicenter trials, standardized protocols, and longer follow-up periods, with greater attention to outcomes such as eating disorder psychopathology, compulsive exercise behaviors, and relapse rates to support the development of individualized exercise prescriptions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I: Evidence obtained from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.