Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129728›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Turkish version of the childbirth readiness scale: validity and reliability study.

Barış Çıplak, Esra Sabancı Baransel, Taylan Onat

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barış ÇıplakMalatya Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malatya, 44090, Turkey.
Esra Sabancı BaranselDepartment of Midwifery, İnönü University, Malatya, 44280, Turkey. esraa.sabancii@gmail.com.
Taylan OnatDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, İnönü University, Malatya, 44280, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildbirth readiness is a key aspect of antenatal care, reducing birth-related fears and enhancing maternal well-being. Given the global decline in fertility rates and the psychological impact of childbirth, assessing Childbirth Readiness levels with reliable measurement tools is to support expectant mothers.

aimThis study aimed to adapt the Childbirth Readiness Scale into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties among pregnant women in the third trimester.

methodsThis methodological study was conducted between February and July 2023 in the obstetric clinics of a public hospital in eastern Türkiye. A total of 626 pregnant women participated in the study, with 321 assigned to Sample I for Exploratory Factor Analysis and 305 to Sample II for Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form and Childbirth Readiness Scale. Validity and reliability analyses were conducted.

resultsThe scale consists of four subscales and 18 items, explaining 61.5% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis model showed that the 4-factor model (Self-management, Information literacy, Birth confidence, and Birth plan) fit the data well. It was found that the total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the entire scale and the 4 factors were 0.87 and 0.67-0.82.

conclusionThe Turkish version of the Childbirth Readiness Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing childbirth readiness among pregnant women in the third trimester. The scale may help identify areas requiring support and guide interventions to improve childbirth preparation.

Indexed as

ParturitionPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultChildbirth readinessPregnancyReliabilityScaleTurkish adaptationValidity

Identifiers

PMID42129728
PMCPMC13343985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.