ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Parents' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding the use of artificial intelligence in pediatric medicine: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in pediatric healthcare, with the potential to improve diagnostic and treatment accuracy and efficiency. However, parental acceptance and trust are critical for successful implementation. The aim of this study is to assess parents' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding the use of AI in pediatric medicine.
methodsA cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH, Southern Area) from 7 to 13 July 2024. Parents of children attending the paediatric outpatient clinics completed a 12-item questionnaire. Data were collected via Google Forms, exported to Excel, and analysed using SPSS.
resultsA total of 254 parents participated. The majority were mothers (58%), with nearly half aged 31-40 years (48%). Most respondents had at least a secondary education (36.2%) or a university-level education (56%). Over half reported some knowledge of AI. While 44% supported its use in paediatrics (14% strongly), 50% were unsure. Parents expected AI to assist in diagnosis (57%), reduce clinic visits (43%), and lower costs (22%). Regarding consent, 47% would agree to its use. Concerns included errors due to incorrect data (58%), lack of transparency (18%), and privacy concerns (17%). Informed consent, autonomy, and accountability were rated as highly important by most participants.
conclusionParents in this study demonstrated moderate knowledge and cautious acceptance of AI in pediatric medicine. While expectations of AI are generally positive, concerns about accuracy, transparency, privacy, and accountability underscore the need for education, clear communication, legislation, and continued physician involvement to build trust and facilitate adoption. RESEARCH REGISTRATION: The research is registered with the IRB of Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.