ArticleBMC public health2026
Strategies and interventions to reduce children's vulnerability to climate change: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change presents serious risks to children's health worldwide, highlighting the need for effective interventions. This study aimed to map and categorize strategies that reduce the health impacts of climate change on children.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus identified peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2015 and 2025. Studies focusing on children and adolescents (0-18 years) and reporting climate-related health interventions, strategies, or policy responses were eligible for inclusion.
resultsA total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Identified interventions were categorized into seven groups: preventive, adaptive, integrated preventive-adaptive, community-based, educational and awareness-based, mental health resilience, and disaster preparedness interventions. Most studies focused on preventive strategies, particularly those addressing exposure to air pollution, heat, and vector-borne diseases. Community-level interventions were predominant, while individual-level, structural, and mental health-focused strategies were less frequently reported. Methodological rigor varied across studies, with economic modeling approaches generally providing stronger evidence than many behavioral or community-based programs. Significant evidence gaps were identified, particularly concerning infants, marginalized populations, and urban poor children.
conclusionsCurrent evidence highlights a predominance of preventive and community-based approaches to reducing children's vulnerability to climate change, alongside notable gaps in equity-focused and mental health interventions. More integrated, multi-level strategies supported by standardized evaluation frameworks are needed to strengthen the effectiveness and equity of climate-related health interventions for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.