ReviewBMC public health2026
The impact of telehealth services on healthcare access in rural areas.
Review in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis review aims to elucidate the role, advantages, and limitations of telehealth in enhancing healthcare access in rural regions globally.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, and specific national databases (including those from Turkey, Australia, and India) for studies published between 2000 and 2024. A PRISMA-style flow approach was used to document the study selection process. Relevant articles, reviews, and reports were analyzed using thematic synthesis.
findingsThe review identified a range of telehealth services that effectively mitigate geographical and socioeconomic barriers by facilitating specialist consultations, enabling chronic disease management, and offering cost-effective solutions. Evidence from multiple studies indicates a reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalization rates. For instance, (Eze, P., Health Serv Insights 15, 2020) demonstrated that telehealth implementation can significantly reduce missed appointments, generating substantial cost savings for clinics. Nevertheless, the review found that significant challenges remain across the literature, including inadequate digital infrastructure, low technological literacy, data security concerns, and regulatory gaps (Butzner, M., & Cuffee, Y J Med Int Res 23:(8) e29575, 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has markedly accelerated the adoption of telehealth practices worldwide (Bashshur, Telemedicine and e-Health 26(5):571-573, 2020).
conclusionTelehealth serves as a transformative tool for improving accessibility and equity in rural healthcare. Sustainable implementation requires prioritized investments in infrastructure, digital literacy programs, comprehensive legal frameworks, and robust cybersecurity measures. Hybrid models that integrate traditional services with telehealth, along with culturally adapted and patient-centered solutions, are crucial for developing inclusive and resilient future health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.