Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129699›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Study protocol for the Breathe Easy All Together e-cigarette prevention program: a RE-AIM framework-based experimental process and impact evaluation.

Catriona Lockett, Smita Shah, Kym Rizzo Liu, Emily Stockings, Matthew Sunderland, Julie Mooney-Somers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. RE-AIM Guided Evaluation of a Comprehensive Tobacco Treatment and Education Program at a Cancer Center.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catriona LockettPrevention Education and Research Unit, Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-8662-4713
Smita ShahPrevention Education and Research Unit, Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia. smita.shah@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7675-1834
Kym Rizzo LiuPrevention Education and Research Unit, Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emily StockingsThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5349-951X
Matthew SunderlandThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8452-364X
Julie Mooney-SomersSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4047-3403

Funding

NHMRC Emerging Leader Fellowship APP2017346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective preventative interventions are urgently needed to address the increasing rates of e-cigarette use among young people and to complement the Australian government's latest tobacco control measures. School-based interventions using peer leaders can effectively shape social norms and expectations associated with tobacco use. This paper describes the protocol for the Breathe Easy All Together (BEAT) study, a process and impact evaluation of the first school-based peer-leadership intervention to prevent adolescent e-cigarette use in Australia.

methodsA pre-post test design will be used to conduct process and impact evaluation of the BEAT program using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) framework. The intervention utilises a multi-component peer-education model driven by students, to promote respiratory health and resist e-cigarette use within a supportive school environment. Volunteer Year 10 students (14- to 16-years-old) will be trained by the research team as peer leaders, to deliver two 60-min lessons to Year 7 students (11- to 13-years-old) during routine health education classes. Year 10 peer leaders and Year 7 students will complete online self-report surveys pre- and post-program to assess changes in the primary outcome of past-30-day e-cigarette use. Secondary outcomes include tobacco use behaviours, e-cigarette knowledge, perceptions, refusal skills, intentions to use e-cigarettes, and acceptability of intervention components. School staff involved in the delivery of the program will participate in semi-structured interviews to examine acceptability and factors affecting program implementation. Descriptive statistics and changes between data collection points will be assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests to investigate intervention effect on primary and secondary outcomes. Qualitative data will be analysed in alignment with RE-AIM constructs using Framework Analysis. DISCUSSION: Building upon an evidence-based peer-education model, BEAT presents a novel peer-led solution to address a gap in current research practice to prevent adolescent e-cigarette use in Australia. It has the potential to protect the future health and wellbeing of students from the harms of e-cigarette use and nicotine addiction. The RE-AIM framework is a comprehensive approach to conducting robust evaluation of multi-faceted interventions in the school environment. If effective, funding support will be sought for wider dissemination and further evaluation.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSchool Health ServicesSmoking PreventionAdolescentAustraliaChildFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupProgram EvaluationResearch DesignAdolescenceE-cigarettesPeer-Education/Peer-ledPreventionSchool-based interventionTobaccoVaping

Identifiers

PMID42129699
PMCPMC13348682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.