ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Rethinking dementia support at home: bridging gaps between healthcare and the social domain.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDementia poses a rapidly increasing global and national challenge, with growing demands on home-based care systems, families, and communities. Although policies encourage people with dementia to remain at home, current support structures remain fragmented, reactive, and overly medicalized. As a result, opportunities to promote autonomy, social participation, and well-being are often missed. This study examines how professionals in healthcare and the social domain experience the organization, collaboration, and quality of home-based dementia support, and identifies ways to improve coordination and awareness of innovative social initiatives.
methodsA qualitative study design grounded in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used. Data were collected through seven focus groups and nine individual interviews with 31 professionals from healthcare, social care, community services, and municipal organizations across the Netherlands. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analyzed following Graneheim and Lundman's six-step qualitative content analysis.
resultsProfessionals described dementia support as a "landscape of isolated islands," marked by minimal interprofessional communication, inconsistent collaboration, and unclear responsibilities. Support often starts too late, focuses predominantly on medical needs, and insufficiently addresses everyday routines, autonomy, and social participation. Limited dementia-specific knowledge across sectors contributes to patronizing communication and reduced involvement of people with dementia in decision-making. Resource constraints-including staff shortages, time pressure, and bureaucratic barriers-further hinder continuity and person-centred support. Participants highlighted the effectiveness of simple, familiar, and inclusive social activities embedded in daily life, and emphasized the need for proactive promotion and a recognizable coordinating professional, such as a practice nurse, case manager, or occupational therapist.
conclusionImproving home-based dementia support requires stronger cross-sector collaboration, earlier and more proactive interventions, and enhanced coordination across health, social, and municipal systems. Embedding simple, meaningful, and community-based activities within everyday life, supported by knowledgeable and trusted professionals, is essential to fostering autonomy, participation, and quality of life for people living with dementia at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.