ArticleBMC primary care2026
Can general practitioners use smoking status data in electronic health records to recruit patients for lung cancer screening? A descriptive study using the MedicineInsight database.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2025, lung cancer screening commenced in Australia, with general practitioners (GPs) being patients' first point of contact to access the program. However, there is a gap in understanding how GPs can effectively identify screening-eligible individuals. Therefore, our study examined how smoking status data are recorded in GPs' electronic health records (EHRs), describing differences in smoking status data by socio-demographic characteristics and co-morbidities, and identifying missing data in EHRs.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. We investigated 1,366,586 adult patients regularly attending general practices in the MedicineInsight database, between 1 July 2021 and 30 June 2022. We assessed patient-related information as proportions, including currently recorded smoking status, socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day amongst patients with a recorded smoking status.
resultsIn our study, 156,881 (11.5%) were recorded as patients who currently smoke, 311,503 (22.8%) as patients who formerly smoked, 766,091 (56.1%) as patients who never smoked, and 132,111 (9.7%) patients did not have smoking status recorded. Smoking status data was better recorded in older age groups, including the lung cancer screening age-eligible population of 50-70-year-olds. Lower socio-economic areas and remote/ very remote areas had higher rates of patients who currently and formerly smoked. Co-morbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and cardiovascular disease had higher numbers of patients who currently and formerly smoked, compared to patients who never smoked. EHR recording of cigarettes smoked per day were limited to only 759 patients with a recorded smoking status.
conclusionsOur study indicates that smoking status was recorded in EHRs for over 90% of regularly attending adult patients during the study period. Whilst GPs can use smoking status in EHRs to help identify potential patients for LCS, GPs will need to further assess these patients for screening eligibility, as detailed smoking history data were poorly recorded in EHRs. Priority populations for GPs include those from lower socio-economic and remote/ very remote areas, and those with certain co-morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.