Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129656›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

From annotation to adaptation: extracting temporal relations in French clinical narratives.

Judith Jeyafreeda Andrew, Juliette Potier, Nicolas Garcelon, Marc Vincent, Anita Burgun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judith Jeyafreeda AndrewClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France. judithjeyafreeda@gmail.com.
Juliette PotierClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France.
Nicolas GarcelonClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France.
Marc VincentClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France.
Anita BurgunClinical Bioinformatics Laboratory, INSERM UMR1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75006, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-P3IA-0001Institut Imagine 10-IAHU-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting temporal information from unstructured clinical narratives is a foundational step toward automated patient timeline generation, a capability that has been proposed as having potential for rare disease diagnosis and care coordination, though prospective clinical validation remains future work. We present a comprehensive framework for temporal relation extraction from French clinical text, addressing a critical gap in non-English clinical NLP resources. We developed specialized annotation guidelines tailored to French medical language and created an annotated corpus of 490 clinical reports from Necker Hospital with 12,464 entity-relation pairs, achieving strong inter-annotator agreement (F1 ≥ 0.94 for core entities). Our comparative evaluation of modern AI approaches-including transformer-based models, large language models, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT)-demonstrates that PEFT with CamemBERT-bio-base achieves the strongest temporal relation extraction performance (F1=0.82-0.87 for major relation types), significantly outperforming traditional approaches and matching few-shot large language models with greater computational efficiency. Entity consolidation substantially improves named entity recognition across all methods (DATE F1=0.96). This work provides validated temporal relation extraction methods as a technical foundation for future patient timeline generation systems. We discuss the pathway toward clinical integration, including deployment requirements, governance considerations, and the prospective validation studies needed to confirm clinical utility-particularly for rare genetic disease populations where automated temporal pattern recognition could support earlier diagnosis.

Indexed as

Data MiningElectronic Health RecordsNarrationNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceFranceHumansLanguageLarge Language ModelsAnnotation guideFrench clinical notesLarge language modelsTemporal entity and Relation extraction

Identifiers

PMID42129656
PMCPMC13339533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.