ArticleBMC genomics2026
Random forest imputation and genomic prediction for missing egg production time-series data in yellow-feathered broiler breeders.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEgg production is a key economic trait in poultry breeding, and its longitudinal records are essential for accurate genetic evaluation. However, time-series egg production data often contain missing values due to sensor failure, recording interruption, or operational error. Such missingness not only reduces the accuracy of phenotypic reconstruction but may also affect downstream breeding-value estimation. This study aimed to compare multiple imputation strategies for missing egg production time-series data and to evaluate them from two complementary perspectives: imputation accuracy and downstream genomic and pedigree-based prediction performance.
resultsWe benchmarked six imputation strategies-Forward-Backward Mean, piecewise linear regression, spline regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest (RF), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks-using datasets from 4,390 yellow-feathered broilers, encompassing more than 100,000 egg production records and 463,000 SNPs. In terms of imputation accuracy, RF consistently outperformed the alternative methods across simulated missingness rates of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%, reducing RMSE by 15.50% - 31.22% and MSE by 28.31% - 52.69%, while improving R
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that Random Forest imputation is a highly effective tool for resolving missing data challenges in egg production time-series. By bridging the gap between raw data processing and genomic prediction, these findings provide a practical computational framework for enhancing the reliability of breeding programs in the poultry industry and other livestock species with longitudinal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.