ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting emergence agitation in children: a multicenter development and validation study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative agitation (EA) is a common complication in pediatric patients, and its early identification is crucial for improving perioperative safety. This study aims to identify the risk factors for EA and develop an interpretable machine learning model.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 445 pediatric patients. Data from 321 patients from one center were used for model development, and 124 patients from another center were selected as an independent validation set. The development dataset was randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 8:2 ratio. Feature selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Six machine learning algorithms were used to build the prediction model: Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Brier, and F1 score. The interpretability of the model was analyzed using the SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method.
resultThe incidence of EA in the development cohort and external validation cohort was 29.5% and 25.8%, respectively. Following feature selection, five clinically relevant predictive variables were identified: parental education level, ALT level, postoperative analgesic pump use, antagonist administration, and the number of suctioning maneuvers during extubation.In internal validation, the support vector machine (SVM) model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.844-0.973). In external validation, the MLP performed optimally, with an AUC of 0.705 (95% CI 0.590-0.804), accuracy of 0.718, sensitivity of 0.645, specificity of 0.780, F1 score of 0.571, and Brier score of 0.190.Given that external validation represents the gold standard for assessing model generalizability, MLP was chosen as the candidate model for clinical application. Using the optimal SVM model derived from internal validation, SHAP analysis demonstrated that shorter recovery time, analgesic pump use, higher parental education level, elevated ALT, no antagonist use, and absence of suctioning during extubation were significant risk factors for EA.Notably, recovery time-an intraoperative indicator-was excluded from the final clinical model to ensure that all predictive variables could be obtained prior to emergence from anesthesia.
conclusionThis study developed and externally validated an interpretable machine learning model for predicting the risk of emergence agitation (EA) in children undergoing elective surgery, incorporating five preoperative or postoperative readily available clinical variables: parental education level, ALT level, postoperative analgesic pump use, antagonist administration, and the number of suctioning maneuvers during extubation. The model exhibited moderate discriminatory performance, and SHAP analysis further clarified the contribution and underlying mechanisms of key risk factors. This model may serve as a preliminary decision-support tool for individualized risk stratification of pediatric EA. Nevertheless, future multicenter prospective studies are warranted to validate its generalizability and clinical utility prior to routine implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.