ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026
Diagnosis and Management of Patent Foramen Ovale for Stroke Prevention: An Australian and New Zealand Consensus Statement Developed by a Modified Nominal Group Approach.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatent foramen ovale (PFO) is implicated in 25%-50% of cryptogenic strokes in patients aged < 60 years. Recent clinical trials demonstrated the benefit of PFO closure in selected patients. However, there is considerable variability in Australian and New Zealand clinical practice regarding investigation and management approaches. A multidisciplinary consensus group comprising stroke neurologists and an interventional cardiologist from major centres employed a modified nominal group technique to develop evidence-based recommendations for standardising PFO-associated stroke management. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: Twelve recommendations were developed across three domains. For patient selection: Universal PFO screening for cryptogenic stroke patients aged ≤ 60 years, with selective screening for patients aged > 60 years with embolic stroke of undetermined source, absent vascular risk factors and excluded atrial fibrillation. For diagnostic investigations: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) bubble study as preferred first-line screening where available, with transthoracic echocardiography as an alternative when TCD is unavailable and transoesophageal echocardiography for confirmation before closure consideration. For treatment decisions: Incorporation of the PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood (PASCAL) classification system rather than the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score alone, consideration of TCD grading results for risk stratification and mandatory multidisciplinary heart-brain team evaluation for all closure decisions. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS CONSENSUS STATEMENT: These recommendations will standardise practice through enhanced TCD service provision, structured heart-brain team development and evidence-based patient selection using the PASCAL classification. The emphasis on TCD as first-line screening represents a departure from traditional transthoracic echocardiography-based approaches. Implementation will improve patient outcomes through appropriate intervention in suitable candidates while avoiding unnecessary procedures in those unlikely to benefit, thereby promoting equitable access to optimal PFO management across Australia and New Zealand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.