ArticleHead & neck2026
Poor Diet and Oral Cavity Cancer Risk in Smoking and Non-Smoking Men and Women: An Analysis of Three US Cohorts.
Article in Head & neck, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOral cavity cancer (OCC) incidence is rising among non-smokers and younger individuals without traditional risk factors. While carcinogenic exposures such as tobacco and alcohol are well studied, the association between unhealthy dietary patterns and OCC has been minimally explored. This study evaluated the association between dietary patterns and OCC risk in men and women.
methodsThis prospective cohort study used data from three large U.S. longitudinal cohorts: the Nurses' Health Study (n = 68 715, 1986-2016), Nurses' Health Study II (n = 93 887, 1991-2017), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (n = 47 923, 1986-2016). Participants included 162 602 women and 47 923 men without cancer at baseline. Dietary intake was assessed every 4 years using validated food frequency questionnaires. Three dietary patterns were evaluated: Western, Prudent, and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI). Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsOver 30 years of follow-up, 226 incident OCC cases were identified (124 in women and 102 in men). Among women, lower adherence to the Prudent and AHEI dietary patterns had higher OCC risk (HR for lowest vs. highest quartile, HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-3.35, and HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.24-3.77, respectively). Among non- or light-smoking and non- or light-drinking women, low adherence to the Prudent diet significantly increased OCC risk (HR for lowest vs. highest quartile 2.94, 95% CI 1.06-8.10). No associations were observed in men. Formal tests for interaction by sex were not statistically significant.
conclusionsLow adherence to Prudent and AHEI dietary patterns was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women but not men that warrants further investigation in larger pooled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.