ArticleNature neuroscience2026
Closed-loop stimulation modulates attention shifting in children.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The many interfaces of neurotechnology.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Adaptive brain stimulation 2.0 for Parkinsonian gait.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spontaneous fluctuations in attention can impede adaptation to changing goals and environments. Endogenous control over attentional shifts, referred to as attentional flexibility, is prone to disruption in children with attention deficit disorders. Here we studied in vivo intracranial recordings in children with epilepsy to identify a reproducible neural signature of attentional control that could predict and prevent impending lapses in real time. Machine learning classifiers were trained on intracranial signals while each child performed an attentional set-shifting task and predicted delays in attention shifting over multiple days and across several pediatric populations. Intracranial electrical stimulation in response to impending delays rescued attention shifts indexed by eye tracking, reaction time and accuracy. Simultaneous electroencephalography identified corresponding scalp signatures that enabled noninvasive modulation of attention shifting in healthy participants. These findings provide insight into the neural basis of attentional shifts with implications for targeted neuromodulation and exogenous attentional control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42129522What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.