ArticleScientific reports2026
Bladder cancer segmentation using u-net-based deep-learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are developing a decision support system for treatment response assessment of bladder cancer by analyzing patients' CT urography (CTU) examinations. Accurate segmentation of bladder lesions is a critical and challenging task. We previously developed a bladder cancer segmentation method using a deep learning convolutional neural network and level sets (DL-CNN + LS). In this study, we designed several deep learning models based on U-Net for bladder cancer segmentation and compared them with DL-CNN + LS and two transformer-based models developed for medical imaging - DATTNet and the Med-Segment Anything Model (Med-SAM). Our new U-Net models did not use the second-stage level set refinement, greatly simplifying the overall segmentation pipeline. We trained and evaluated the models by using radiologist's hand-drawn 3D contours as the reference standard. The proposed Crop U-Net model, utilizing a user-defined box to direct the U-Net attention to the lesion region by masking out the structured background, was superior to other models being investigated. On the independent test set, the Crop U-Net achieved average Jaccard index (AJI) of 48.1 ± 18.0% and average minimum distance (AMD) of 4.3 ± 3.0 mm, while the DL-CNN + LS achieved AJI of 33.2 ± 20.0% and AMD of 5.3 ± 2.2 mm. The results demonstrated that the Crop U-Net could achieve a higher accuracy than the previous DL-CNN + LS while reducing the complexity of the segmentation pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.