Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129497›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Large language model-based screening of substances and their composition from safety data sheets for high-resolution chemical exposure assessment.

Daeyeop Lee, Kiyoung Lee, Sewon Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daeyeop LeeSchool of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kiyoung LeeSchool of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sewon LeeUCD Centre for Safety and Health at Work, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. sewon.lee@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSDSs provide information on chemical substances in professional and consumer products. Large language models (LLMs) offer a rapid approach to screening chemical information from SDSs.

objectiveThis study aimed to validate the performance of LLMs in accurately extracting substance information from SDSs of products.

methodsChemical information was extracted from the SDSs of cleaning products using the LLMs ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The performance of the LLMs was evaluated against manually extracted data using precision, sensitivity, and F1 score.

resultsA total of 301 substance-composition combinations across 59 products were included in the validation. The Gemini 2.5 Pro model showed a higher F1 score (1.00) than ChatGPT-4o (0.94). SIGNIFICANCE: LLMs enable high-throughput chemical information extraction from SDSs, reducing the burden of manual screening and supporting large-scale combined-exposure assessments. IMPACT STATEMENT: The accurate identification of chemical substances in professional and consumer products is a major challenge in assessing complex chemical exposures in exposure science and epidemiology. This study validated the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as a novel, rapid, and highly accurate method of extracting high-throughput chemical data from multilingual Safety Data Sheets. Our findings illustrated that LLMs could be effectively used to overcome the labor-intensive and time-consuming limitations of manual data screening. This approach allows high-throughput analysis, enabling comprehensive combined-exposure assessments in large-scale epidemiological and exposure assessment studies. Additionally, as LLMs can extract data in different languages, they can facilitate international research collaboration.

Indexed as

Large language modelsPerformanceSafety data sheetsValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.