ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Large language model-based screening of substances and their composition from safety data sheets for high-resolution chemical exposure assessment.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSDSs provide information on chemical substances in professional and consumer products. Large language models (LLMs) offer a rapid approach to screening chemical information from SDSs.
objectiveThis study aimed to validate the performance of LLMs in accurately extracting substance information from SDSs of products.
methodsChemical information was extracted from the SDSs of cleaning products using the LLMs ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The performance of the LLMs was evaluated against manually extracted data using precision, sensitivity, and F1 score.
resultsA total of 301 substance-composition combinations across 59 products were included in the validation. The Gemini 2.5 Pro model showed a higher F1 score (1.00) than ChatGPT-4o (0.94). SIGNIFICANCE: LLMs enable high-throughput chemical information extraction from SDSs, reducing the burden of manual screening and supporting large-scale combined-exposure assessments. IMPACT STATEMENT: The accurate identification of chemical substances in professional and consumer products is a major challenge in assessing complex chemical exposures in exposure science and epidemiology. This study validated the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as a novel, rapid, and highly accurate method of extracting high-throughput chemical data from multilingual Safety Data Sheets. Our findings illustrated that LLMs could be effectively used to overcome the labor-intensive and time-consuming limitations of manual data screening. This approach allows high-throughput analysis, enabling comprehensive combined-exposure assessments in large-scale epidemiological and exposure assessment studies. Additionally, as LLMs can extract data in different languages, they can facilitate international research collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42129497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.