ArticleScientific reports2026
MRI-based habitat and peritumoral radiomics for predicting HER2 status in breast cancer: a multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MRI-based radiomics has shown potential for differentiating HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancers; however, the added value of integrating intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) and peritumoral habitat features remains unclear. In this retrospective retrospective study, 515 patients from five hospitals were included and divided into training, internal testing, and external validation cohorts. Radiomic features were extracted from intratumor, peritumor, and habitat regions. Habitat subregions were generated using a Gaussian mixture model, and an ITH index was constructed. Three radiomics models (intratumor+peritumor, ITH, and peritumor + ITH) and a combined clinical-radiomics model were developed. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and decision curve analysis. Among all models, the peritumor + ITH model showed comparatively better performance among the evaluated models. For Task 1 (HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative), the model yielded AUCs ranging from 0.713 to 0.791 across different cohorts. For Task 2 (HER2-low vs. HER2-zero), it achieved an AUC of 0.839 in the training cohort, 0.831 in the internal testing cohort, and 0.799 and 0.734 in the external validation cohorts, respectively. The combined model further improved predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.802 in external validation cohort 1 and 0.760 in cohort 2. Decision curve analysis demonstrated superior clinical utility of the combined model compared with other approaches. MRI-based habitat radiomics integrating intratumor heterogeneity and peritumoral features provides a promising non-invasive complementary tool for predicting HER2 status and supporting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.