ReviewNPJ digital medicine2026
Electrocardiogram-derived respiratory rate: State-of-the-art and implications for remote cardiopulmonary monitoring.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate respiratory rate (RR) measurement is essential for early detection of physiological deterioration, yet conventional approaches remain limited by poor robustness and restricted suitability for continuous or remote monitoring. ECG-derived respiratory rate (EDRR) offers a non-invasive alternative by exploiting respiration-induced modulations in cardiac electrical activity, including morphological changes, heart rate variability, and their combined effects. This review provides a structured synthesis of EDRR methods, spanning physiological mechanisms, signal acquisition and preprocessing considerations, and algorithmic approaches including morphology-based, autonomic (heart rate variability/spectral), and fusion strategies. We further evaluate datasets, validation practices, and performance trade-offs across controlled and real-world conditions. Key challenges include susceptibility to motion artifacts, inter-subject variability, inconsistent evaluation protocols, and limited generalizability in ambulatory settings. Addressing these limitations is critical for translating EDRR techniques into robust, scalable solutions for wearable and telehealth-based respiratory monitoring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.