Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129467›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Understanding continuance intention toward AI-driven healthcare services: the moderating role of e-Health Literacy.

Yuan Jiang, Shijie Wu, Minghao Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuan JiangShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. syekjy@163.com.
Shijie WuShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Minghao KongShanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI-driven healthcare services are increasingly used to support health consultation, symptom triage, appointment navigation, and routine health management. However, sustaining users' post-adoption engagement remains challenging, particularly because users differ in their ability to access, evaluate, and apply online health information. This study examines the determinants of continuance intention toward AI-driven healthcare services and investigates whether e-Health Literacy moderates selected relationships in the post-adoption process. Drawing on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, the Information Adoption Model, and Privacy Calculus Theory, this study developed an integrated model of continuance intention. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 580 users of AI-driven healthcare services in Shanghai, China. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Source trustworthiness, information quality, and effort expectancy were positively associated with performance expectancy. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and perceived interactivity were positively associated with continuance intention, whereas perceived privacy risk was negatively associated with continuance intention. e-Health Literacy positively moderated the relationship between information quality and performance expectancy and negatively moderated the relationship between effort expectancy and continuance intention. However, the moderation effects were small in magnitude and should be interpreted cautiously. This study extends post-adoption research on AI-driven healthcare services by showing how users' e-Health Literacy may shape the relative importance of information quality and ease of use. The findings suggest that inclusive AI healthcare design should combine trustworthy, high-quality information with interfaces that reduce use barriers for users with lower e-Health Literacy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHealth LiteracyIntentionAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAI-driven healthcareContinuance intentionDigital healthE-Health LiteracyPLS-SEMPrivacy riskUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID42129467
PMCPMC13365482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.