Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrating scanning electron microscopy, explainable deep learning, and ITS sequencing for accurate identification in some species Geastrum.

Eda Kumru, Şehmus Altaş, Gülce Ediş, Fatih Ekinci, Koray Acici, Mehmet Serdar Güzel, Emre Keskin, Mustafa Sevindik, Ilgaz Akata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eda KumruDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, 06830, Ankara, Turkey.
Şehmus AltaşFonet Information Technologies INC, 06510, Ankara, Turkey.
Gülce EdişDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, 06830, Ankara, Turkey.
Fatih EkinciInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Ankara University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
Koray AciciDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University, 06830, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Serdar GüzelDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University, 06830, Ankara, Turkey.
Emre KeskinEvolutionary Genetics Laboratory (eGL), Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Agricultural Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mustafa SevindikDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80000, Osmaniye, Turkey. sevindik27@gmail.com.
Ilgaz AkataDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differentiation of species within the genus Geastrum remains a challenging task due to the strong morphological similarity among taxa and the limited discriminatory power of macroscopic characteristics alone. Although molecular approaches based on DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and ITS sequencing provide reliable taxonomic resolution, they are labor-intensive, destructive, and unsuitable for rapid or large-scale analyses. In this study, a comprehensive framework integrating scanning electron microscopy (SEM) based basidiospore imaging with modern deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques is proposed for fine-grained classification of Geastrum species. A curated dataset comprising 800 high-resolution SEM images from (Geastrum elegans, G. fimbriatum, G. quadrifidum, G. rufescens, and G. triplex) was evaluated using multiple convolutional and transformer-based architectures, including DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0, ConvNeXt-Tiny, and Swin-Tiny, as well as several ensemble configurations. Among all models, DenseNet121 achieved the highest single-model performance, reaching approximately 99.00% accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and specificity, with an MCC of 0.98 and an AUC approaching 1.00. Ensemble models, particularly DenseNet121-EfficientNetB0 and DenseNet121-ConvNeXt-Swin, consistently matched or slightly improved these results, demonstrating enhanced robustness and class separability. Explainable AI analyses based on LIME confirmed that model predictions are driven by biologically meaningful ultrastructural features, such as spore ornamentation patterns and surface textures, rather than spurious artifacts. Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on nrITS sequences independently supported the species boundaries inferred by the deep learning models. Overall, the results demonstrate that SEM-driven, explainable deep learning constitutes a powerful and objective complement to classical morphological and molecular approaches, offering a scalable pathway for accurate and reproducible species identification in taxonomically complex fungal groups.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningConvolutional Neural NetworksPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASpores, FungalDeep learningExplainable artificial intelligenceGeastrumMolecular taxonomyScanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID42129448
PMCPMC13365418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.