Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129436›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Synergistic rhizobacteria enhance physio-biochemical resilience and sustain tomato yield under drought stress.

Preeti, Pradeep Kumar Rai, Danish Mushtaq Khanday, Sadiya M Choudhary, Monika Singh, Sadaf Wani, Pradeep Kumar, Nazim S Gruda, Gyanendra Kumar Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Preeti *Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, 180009, JK, UT, India.
Pradeep Kumar Rai *Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, 180009, JK, UT, India.
Danish Mushtaq KhandayDivision of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, 180009, JK, UT, India.
Sadiya M ChoudharyInstitute of Biotechnology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and technology of Jammu, Chatha, 180009, JK, UT, India.
Monika SinghG.L. Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, 201306, Utter Pradesh, India.
Sadaf WaniInstitute of Biotechnology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and technology of Jammu, Chatha, 180009, JK, UT, India.
Pradeep Kumar *Division of Integrated Farming System, ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, 342003, India.
Nazim S GrudaUniversity of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. ngruda@uni-bonn.de.
Gyanendra Kumar RaiInstitute of Biotechnology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and technology of Jammu, Chatha, 180009, JK, UT, India. gkrai70@skuastj.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beneficial rhizobacteria can enhance plant growth and stress resilience through multiple, complementary mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the combined effects of Azotobacter chroococcum, Pseudomonas putida, and Bacillus subtilis on tomato plants subjected to drought stress. The primary objective was to assess whether a combined bacterial inoculation could mitigate the negative impacts of drought on tomato growth and productivity. We hypothesized that the consortium would act synergistically to improve drought tolerance by enhancing physiological performance and biochemical defense systems, including photosynthetic activity and antioxidant enzyme responses. The combined application of beneficial rhizobacteria significantly increased total chlorophyll content from 0.85 to 1.70 mg g⁻¹ FW and relative water content from 55.41 to 72.06%, while maintaining higher photosynthetic pigment levels than drought-stressed controls. Biochemical analyses revealed markedly higher activities of antioxidant enzymes, with superoxide dismutase increasing to 35.4 µmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ FW, catalase to 74.6 µmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ FW, and peroxidase to 0.89 µmol g⁻¹ FW, indicating more effective mitigation of drought-induced oxidative stress. All individual rhizobacterial treatments significantly increased tomato yield relative to drought stress, reaching 0.81, 0.86, and 0.88 kg plant⁻¹ under inoculation with (A) chroococcum, P. putida, and (B) subtilis, respectively. The bacterial consortium produced the highest yield of 0.94 kg plant⁻¹. Overall, these findings demonstrate that synergistic plant-microbe interactions can substantially enhance drought tolerance and productivity in tomato. Future studies should examine the long-term stability and field performance of microbial consortia, their interactions with native soil microbiomes, and their scalability for sustainable crop production in water-limited agroecosystems.

Indexed as

DroughtsSolanum lycopersicumStress, PhysiologicalAntioxidantsAzotobacterBacillus subtilisChlorophyllDrought ResistancePhotosynthesisPlant RootsPseudomonas putidaRhizosphereAntioxidantsChlorophyllAbiotic stress responseCellular protectionRoot-microbe interactionStress mitigation

Identifiers

PMID42129436
PMCPMC13172537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.