ArticleScientific reports2026
Stress modulates gastric interoception depending on eating traits and emotion regulation: evidence from the magic table.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high prevalence of obesity and low treatment response in eating disorders highlight the need for a better understanding of eating regulation. Gastric interoception - the perception of signals such as hunger and satiation - plays a key role in aligning food intake with physiological needs. This study investigated how acute stress, emotion regulation difficulties, and eating traits influence gastric interoceptive sensitivity. Ninety-four fasting participants completed both a stress and control task in counterbalanced order across two laboratory sessions. Gastric interoceptive sensitivity was assessed using a novel method, the Magic Table (MT), in which participants ate yogurt from a self-refilling bowl until satiation and fullness. Multi-level modeling evaluated stress effects and moderation by self-reported eating traits and emotion regulation. For validation, 61 participants also completed the established Two-step Water Load Test (WLT-II) and free food consumption. Medium to strong correlations between MT indices, WLT-II, and food intake supported the validity of the MT. While stress had no overall effect on gastric interoception, cross-level interactions showed reduced fullness sensitivity under stress in individuals with high emotion regulation difficulties, restrained, and uncontrolled eating. These findings suggest that this group may be at risk for interoceptive desensitization under stress and inform studies on interoception-focused interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.