ArticleScientific reports2026
Patterns in the distribution of Ecuadorian amphibian type localities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In taxonomy, the type locality of a species is a fundamental concept, as relevant to the species description as the definition of morphological characters. Although they hold a high intrinsic scientific, cultural and social value, their conservation has been globally overlooked. As a showcase, we focused our study on a megadiverse country (Ecuador) and a diverse group of vertebrates (amphibians). We georeferenced the type localities of all amphibian species reported from Ecuador, evaluated chronological changes in their distribution, assessed the factors that affect their location, and emphasized areas of high conservation value. We found that the distribution of type localities is affected by road access and closeness to inhabited centers, most are unprotected, and more intense sampling in an area leads to a higher number of type localities there, while the relationship with species richness is more complex. Our study reveals "hotspots" of type localities, and in many cases their protection status can be improved through marginal extension of already established reserves. These sites represent a priority for the conservation of microendemic species (over 20%), and they have potential to bolster conservation actions given the social interest in their historical dimension and attractiveness for the general public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.