ArticleScientific reports2026
Distinct clinical course and poor outcomes of small bowel bleeding in acute hematochezia: a nationwide multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although small bowel bleeding is a known cause of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB), its outcomes compared to colorectal bleeding remain underexplored. This study aimed to identify baseline characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes associated with small bowel bleeding in comparison to colorectal bleeding. This nationwide retrospective cohort study, based on CODE BLUE-J study, involved 10,342 patients hospitalized for ALGIB. Among 195 patients (2.8%) with acute small bowel bleeding, significant associations were observed with laboratory parameters (e.g., low hemoglobin, platelets, and albumin), clinical signs (e.g., tarry stool), and medical history, compared to 6832 patients with colorectal bleeding. Multivariate regression analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day rebleeding or mortality between small bowel and colorectal bleeding. However, small bowel bleeding was associated with higher transfusion volume, lower endoscopic treatment rate, higher rates of interventional radiology and surgery, and longer hospital stay (all p < 0.005). While long-term cumulative rebleeding rates were similar, cumulative mortality was significantly higher in the small bowel bleeding group (p < 0.001). This large-scale endoscopic study revealed differences in several clinical factors at presentation and in short- and long-term outcomes between small bowel and colorectal bleeding. These findings underscore importance of identifying small bowel bleeding in ALGIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.