ArticleScientific reports2026
A modified four-zone classification of the posterior lumbar spinal canal: An anatomical study and clinical application in microchannel surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces and evaluates a modified four-zone classification of the posterior lumbar spinal canal, assessing its anatomical basis and clinical utility in guiding microchannel surgery. Current minimally invasive lumbar procedures rely predominantly on fluoroscopic imaging of bony landmarks for localization, often neglecting the consistent anatomical boundaries provided by the ligamentum flavum for surgical orientation and trajectory planning. Anatomical measurements were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines to define key parameters of the ligamentum flavum and their spatial relationships with adjacent structures. A retrospective clinical analysis compared 223 patients undergoing microchannel surgery: 103 patients in the conventional localization group (Group A) and 120 patients in the modified four-zone classification group (Group B). Outcomes assessed included fluoroscopy time, microchannel tilt angle, estimated blood loss, operative duration, length of hospital stay, VAS scores, ODI, and Modified MacNab criteria. Anatomically, the interligamentum flavum space measured 12.3 ± 1.8 mm on the left and 11.9 ± 1.9 mm on the right, with the S-point located approximately midway between the ligamentum flavum boundaries. Clinically, Group B demonstrated significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (4.4 ± 1.4 vs. 5.7 ± 1.7 min, p < 0.01), microchannel tilt angle (7.8 ± 2.7° vs. 10.1 ± 3.6°, p < 0.01), blood loss (44.7 ± 12.7 vs. 58.5 ± 13.5 ml, p < 0.01), operative time (69.4 ± 22.5 vs. 81.4 ± 27.1 min, p < 0.01), along with less early postoperative incision pain and length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). While long-term improvements in back pain VAS and ODI scores were similar between groups, Group B demonstrated superior outcomes in both leg pain VAS scores (final score: 0.5 ± 0.6 vs. 1.8 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) and patient satisfaction (Modified MacNab Excellent/Good rate: 85.8% vs. 75.7%, p = 0.03).The modified four-zone classification offers an anatomically reliable framework for posterior lumbar microchannel surgery, enabling precise anatomical targeting, reducing radiation exposure, and improving both perioperative and long-term functional outcomes, This approach may facilitate the standardization and enhancement of procedural precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.