ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Chlorinated drinking water exposure enriches antimicrobial resistance pathways in the infant gut microbiome: a randomized trial.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWater chlorination is essential for controlling harmful microbes in drinking water; however, the antimicrobial effects of chlorine-based disinfectants present in tap water may influence early-life gut microbial ecology.
objectiveTo investigate the functional and compositional impact of chlorinated drinking water on the gut microbiome of infants.
designThe waTer qUality and Microbiome Study (TUMS) was an Australian-based double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Six-month-old infants (n = 197) received either de-chlorinated drinking water via benchtop filtration (treatment, n = 99), or regular chlorinated water (control, n = 98) for twelve months. Tap water and stool samples were collected at baseline and at end of intervention. Metagenomic sequencing was used for faecal microbiome analysis. Primary outcomes were differences in gut microbiota between groups, secondary outcomes included incidence of allergic sensitization and respiratory conditions.
resultsAt baseline, 170 stool samples (83 control, 87 intervention) were collected, with 130 samples obtained at the end of the intervention (65 control, 65 intervention). Overall community structure was similar between groups after the intervention, including beta diversity (0.56% variance explained; p = 0.84), richness (-4.25, 95% CI; -14.85 to 6.35, p = 0.43) or Shannon Index (-0.14, 95% CI; -0.32 to 0.04, p = 0.12). The chlorinated water group showed enrichment of antibiotic resistance MetaCyc groups and pathways (adjusted p < 0.05). Stratified analysis suggested this effect was potentiated by clinical antibiotic use.
conclusionChlorinated drinking water may enhance resistance functions in the infant gut microbiome. While remaining vital for public health, future studies should explore whether adjusting the timing or method of drinking water disinfectants into the infant diet can reduce selective pressures.
trial registrationACTRN12619000458134; https://www.anzctr.org.au.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.