ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust automatic soft tissue flap segmentation using a challenging case-enriched nnU-Net in head and neck CT images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstructive surgery with a flap makes the definition of postoperative radiotherapy volumes challenging. It may also result in errors in automatic segmentation atlases of organ-at-risk and nodal volumes. Automating flap segmentation process could assist clinicians in planning radiotherapy and enable characterization of flap evolution over time and after radiotherapy. Flaps vary significantly in shape, volumes and associated artefacts. We therefore enriched a previously built training dataset with challenging cases to obtain a more robust real-world flap segmentation. Within the framework of the state-of-the-art nnU-Net deep learning architecture, we investigated whether constructing a training dataset with enhanced representation of challenging cases, often associated with poor segmentation performance or outright failures, could improve the overall accuracy and robustness of automated flap segmentation, based on Dice scores compared through paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Clinical trial and real-world data were selected to increase the heterogeneity and enrich the training set with rare challenging cases (such as pedicled flaps, small flaps, unusual location including maxillary flaps, bone resection, presence of dental artefacts or bite block). This enriched training dataset led to improved performance of the nnU-Net model, increasing the mean Dice scores from 0.66 ± 0.29 to 0.74 ± 0.20 (p < 0.001), with median Dice scores rising from 0.76 to 0.80. Robust flap segmentation was achieved without modifying the neural network architecture, loss function, or algorithmic structure, through enrichment of the training set with anatomically and visually challenging cases. This model can be used for detailed analysis of geometrical and textural flap changes over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.