ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Experiences and expert panel consensus on bridging therapy before anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy in multiple myeloma.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Remission: Risk-Adapted Maintenance and Mechanism-Guided Salvage After CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy to treat relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma is increasing. Studies suggest that effective bridging therapy (BT) prior to anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy can enhance efficacy and safety outcomes. Through qualitative interviews and a consensus workshop, 10 European experts shared their clinical experience regarding optimal BT selection, efficacy, safety and outcomes post-CAR-T, focussing on heavily pretreated patients and emerging BT options, such as bispecific T-cell engagers. Experts agreed that BT should aim to reduce tumour burden and maintain or improve patient performance status, while avoiding treatment-related toxicity that could delay or prevent CAR-T infusion. The balance between treatment duration and achieving an adequate response is important, and patient characteristics are key for BT selection, especially in difficult-to-treat populations. Here, we discuss the unique therapy talquetamab, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, which demonstrates robust efficacy and rapid response rates in clinical trials, and is being considered as a BT option before anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy based on expert experience and real-world data. This consensus, based on clinical experience, aims to provide guidance on BT for healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy and aid standardisation of care in this rapidly advancing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.