ArticleScientific reports2026
A two-stage differential evolution algorithm for neural ensemble architecture search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural ensembles, comprising multiple heterogeneous neural networks, show promise in machine learning tasks. Their efficacy depends on architecture design, traditionally relying on deep learning expertise. Neural ensemble architecture search methods aim to automate this process, but face challenges in balancing diversity, performance, and computational efficiency. This study introduces DENE, a differential evolution algorithm for NEAS, addressing these limitations. DENE employs a two-stage framework to generate neural ensembles with a multi-head structure, incorporating a surrogate model-based ranking strategy to reduce computational resources during performance evaluation. A novel diversity measurement function enables DENE to optimize for both accuracy and diversity through multi-objective optimization. Experiments on benchmark image classification datasets compare DENE against state-of-the-art evolutionary neural architecture search and NEAS algorithms. Results demonstrate that DENE efficiently generates highly competitive neural ensembles, outperforming existing methods in performance and search time. This research contributes to automated machine learning by providing a more efficient and effective approach to neural ensemble design, potentially broadening the applicability of these powerful models across various domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.