ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on overhead transmission line planning based on an improved A* algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient route planning for overhead transmission lines is crucial for reducing construction costs, ensuring operational safety, and improving environmental adaptability. Traditional algorithms such as Dijkstra and rapidly-exploring random tree (RRT) demonstrate certain advantages in finding feasible paths or exploring complex terrain features, yet they still suffer from issues including excessive turning angles, high terrain undulation sensitivity, and suboptimal overall path smoothness. To address these limitations, this paper proposes an improved A*-based route planning method that incorporates a multi-source constraint cost function that simultaneously considers path length, terrain undulation, number of crossings through risk areas, and turning angle. Simulation results indicate that the proposed method achieves a more balanced optimization effect among multiple metrics. Comparative experiments based on four different cost function methods demonstrate that Method D (the final proposed method) provides optimal performance with a path length of 5482 m, an average terrain undulation of 1.9 m, six crossings, and the lowest turning angle of 51.8°. Further compared with Dijkstra and RRT, the improved A* method reduces the total turning angle by 28.6% and 46.5%, respectively, while maintaining a competitive path length and minimizing cross-terrain risk. Overall, the proposed method improves route smoothness and environmental adaptability while ensuring routing feasibility, which verifies its applicability for intelligent transmission line planning and offers references for engineering practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.