ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatio-temporal gait signatures across prodromal and early Parkinson's disease in two independent cohorts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gait abnormalities are key features of Parkinson's disease (PD) and might be present in isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (iRBD), a prodromal marker of alpha-synucleinopathy. To assess spatio-temporal gait parameters from prodromal (iRBD) to early/moderate PD stages in normal, fast and dual-task conditions. This prospective multicenter study included two independent cohorts with Polysomnography-confirmed iRBD, drug-naïve PD (naïve-PD), early and moderate treated PD (early-PD, mid-PD), and age-matched healthy controls (HC). Gait was assessed using mobile health technology. A total of 324 participants were enrolled: 194 in the Digital Neurological Assessment (DNA) cohort (23 iRBD, 57 naïve-PD, 49 mid-PD, 65 HC) and 130 in the TPA cohort (28 iRBD, 34 early-PD, 68 HC) composed from TREND, PASS-PD and ABCPD cohorts. In the two independent cohorts, iRBD and early PD (treated and non-treated) showed higher step time compared to HC, especially during dual-task gait. In fast walking, all patient groups had longer step time than HC. Step length was control-like in iRBD and early treated PD, whereas it was lower in both naïve and moderate stages PD in all different task conditions. Temporal gait parameters, especially during dual task walking, are sensitive markers of prodromal PD whereas reduced step length is occurring only in phases when PD diagnosis is already possible. These cross-sectional data need a further validation on ongoing longitudinal studies in prodromal and early stages PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.