Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning and IoT-based framework for sesame plant identification and weed detection.

P Nagaraj, V Muneeswaran, K Muthamil Sudar, Sheik Abdul Kader Sheik Asraf, Suresh Muthusamy, Choon Kit Chan, Chandrakant Sonawane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P NagarajDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-8544
V MuneeswaranDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, School of Electronics, Electrical and Biomedical Technology, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Anand Nagar, Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar, Krishnankoil, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-8529
K Muthamil SudarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Virudhunagar, Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9640-3477
Sheik Abdul Kader Sheik AsrafDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio, Chemical and Processing Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Anand Nagar, Srivilliputtur, Virudhunagar, Krishnankoil, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-5329
Suresh MuthusamyDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College (Autonomous), Perundurai, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-2054
Choon Kit ChanFaculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Chandrakant SonawaneSymbiosis Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. chandrakant.sonawane@sitpune.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated weed identification in agriculture is a prominent and promising technological intervention as it improves the overall crop productivity and yield. But finding weeds in dense sesame fields is still hard because of occlusion and changes in lighting. This work suggests a hybrid deep learning model that works with IoT to solve these problems. The method uses a Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN) model to find sesame plants and weeds. Approximately 1,300 images with YOLO-formatted annotations were used for training and testing. This technique includes making region recommendations, preprocessing images, utilizing a CNN architecture to classify objects, training an SVM, and leveraging CNN features to improve item bounding boxes. The model's structure is made up of three parts: CNN fine-tuning, CNN + SVM, and bounding box regression. The process of preparing the data included finding and sorting regions of interest. Subsequently, these areas are sorted into groups based on how they overlap with real-world items. After that, the features that were found were used to make accurate bounding boxes around the items that were found, which led to the best classification. The model in question achieved 99.73% classification accuracy with a maximum bounding box IoU accuracy of 0.787 during the forecast procedure. The methodology delineated in this study possesses the potential for application in agricultural sectors for weed removal in farming fields.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInternet of ThingsPlant WeedsSesamumAgricultureClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDetection AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAgricultureDeep learningIoTProcess innovationRegion-based convolutional neural networksWeeds

Identifiers

PMID42129279
PMCPMC13377176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.